Writing is one of my passions. I think it's because I love the way words try to mime the abstract.
But at some point we have to face the hard question: aren't words just symbols?
If feels like the most they can do is awaking memories of very particular feelings in each person. There's no way to know if what was explained by words was truly comprehended by the listener/reader as words are inert.
However, we can't deny they can be very powerful. After all, if they weren't, we wouldn't be touched by books and music lyrics, but we are. They make us laugh, cry and connect to one's own experiences. They even make us feel like they can give us life.
But I'm afraid they're still just portraits of feelings and realities. Words do not guarantee veracity. They can be empty. They can be shaped. They can be embellished. They can be exaggerated.
Take saying I love you, for example. It's so silly!
Ok, maybe not completely silly, but I have faith in my opinion that Love and other feelings shouldn't be stated by words, but by actions instead.
A loving look is worth much more than a thousand statements of the phrase written with blood on the wall.
I believe that the need to take care of someone and manifest a feeling actively must be bigger than the impulse of projecting the feeling with a mere phrase. Especially because the word(symbol) Love is very vague and unclear. We have all loved in different ways and in distinct intensities in various periods of our lives. Therefore, what is the difference between the "I Love You" you hear from me and the "I Love You" you hear from a drunken bum on the street? No difference. The difference is that you Think you know what both people mean and you Think you understand the intensity of their feelings and their reasons, but you don't really know for sure, do you?
So that's why I say that the difference is in the actions behind the statement. It's in the person's eyes. In their touch.
If you think about it, saying I Love You is not highly necessary as actions confirm the feeling in a much more coherent way than symbols ever will.
In fact, from this day on, whenever someone tells me they love me and I'm not able to see it in their eyes, feel it in their touch and hear it in their voice, my reaction shall be a nice and fat "prove it.".
Instead of worrying about thinking of what to say back and analyse if I love the person or not, I'll do my best to make her feel all the feelings I have for her.
Feelings that are unspeakable, undefinable and uncontainable, therefore, true.
And if that person possesses the mental clarity to understand I'm not in search of plain words, but instead, of intense feelings that don't need to be named, then I'll know I'll have found someone worthy of my consideration.
After that I could open myself to the possibility that the person really loves me.
It sounds a bit complicated, but it's quite simple.
In fact, this will be my way of avoiding that this symbol becomes too trivial and at the same time, to stop me from giving it a large amount of credit.
The best thing is that any person who understands how Love has become increasingly tainted will have to agree that the true expression of the feeling should take much more than the courage(or cowardice) to say these three little words.
After all, we have all been through enough and we should have already learnt that words are just words.